Happy 75th Birthday, Willie
Drug WarRant @ April 29, 2008 # No Comment Yet
[Via NORML]
Lies and the lying liars…
Drug WarRant @ April 29, 2008 # No Comment Yet
There are so many ways to lie, and the drug czar knows them all. But it’s a game of sorts — his office likes to pretend they’re not really lying, that they’re… technically telling the truth.
Usually they use the sleight of hand lie — unrelated or irrelevant statements intended to mislead
- “Evidence now tells us that the higher-than-ever potency of today’s marijuana translates into serious health consequences for teens. Among teens who are receiving treatment for drug abuse or dependence, more than 60% report marijuana as their primary drug of abuse.”
- Marijuana contains hundreds of carcinogens.
Two prime examples of the slight of hand lie. The first one simply ignores the fact that most people in for marijuana treatment are there not because of any dependence, but because they were referred there by the criminal justice system. So the statistics have absolutely nothing to do with higher THC or addictive qualities of marijuana. The second is intended to imply that marijuana causes cancer (Since the largest study in the world — funded by the U.S. government — proved that there is no risk of lung cancer from smoking marijuana, Walters cannot come out and say that marijuana causes cancer, but he can use the sleight of hand lie.
And then there’s another kind of lie. Simply find someone so utterly and incredibly low that they don’t mind giving the obvious lies, and approvingly link to them.
The legalization of meat - an allegory
Drug WarRant @ April 29, 2008 # No Comment Yet
Someone approached me with a question:
We already have two legal meats in this country, beef and pork. And these have caused all sorts of problems with cholesterol, heart attacks and obesity. People like them too much, so we’ll probably never be able to get rid of them, but why should we add another dangerous meat, by legalizing chicken?
And so I answered:
- This is a free country and you don’t get to decide that people in power like pork so it’s OK, but I can’t be allowed to like chicken. You can (and should) inform me of the real dangers involved in any of the meats and encourage me to consume them responsibly, but you can’t sit there swallowing sausage and send me to jail for my chicken breast.
- Chicken is actually better for you than beef and pork in many ways. Legal chicken could mean that some people will occasionally eat chicken instead of beef. And that’s a good thing. Imagine if, when you went to Wendy’s, instead of just having hamburgers, you could instead get a grilled chicken sandwich or chicken nuggets. How is that a bad thing?
- Chicken has a whole range of nutritional and health benefits.
- Making chicken illegal has not stopped people from eating meat (or even eating chicken). And it’s caused a host of other problems.
- You’re a moron.
Open Thread
Drug WarRant @ April 29, 2008 # No Comment Yet
Nice to see a college OpEd with some sense.
This is how the world looks when you are only able to perceive one side of things. Then the only question you can ask is how to make prohibition work and you are unaware that the word “whether” exists.
How dysfunctional is the drug war? Just check this out: A D.A.R.E. officer(!) arranges a major drug transaction… in the parking lot of an elementary school. Investigators are onto the rogue officer and tape the transaction, while accidentally broadcasting it over the police scanner to anyone who might be listening.
Excellent editorial against student drug testing
Drug WarRant @ April 27, 2008 # No Comment Yet
Hey, Testers, Leave Those Kids Alone
* If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear. This is the single most odious line of reasoning ever concocted because it misses the point. People, including students, are not required to prove they’ve done nothing wrong.
Legalization discussion
Drug WarRant @ April 27, 2008 # No Comment Yet
There’s an extensive legalization comment thread over at Marginal Revolution. Some of the comments are quite uninformed, but there are a few reasoned individuals as well. It comes from a discussion of whether prohibition violence would really decrease with legalization (something we know for certain).
Here’s the part that really gets surreal:
Under one model, local gangs have a more or less fixed ability to terrorize a neighborhood. Even if everything is legalized, the gangs will continue local monopolies to maximize tribute, subject of course to constraints from other gangs and the police. In this model, legalizing drugs doesn’t do much good. The local gang either shifts its monopoly to another area (milk and sugar, if need be), or de facto the gang’s local monopoly on the drug trade continues. The gang busts you if you try to get your supply of crack cocaine from Merck.
It’s one of the more bizarre notions I’ve heard (even though Tyler Cowen only believes that it will be partly operative).
There’s no way that criminals can compete with a reasonably priced, well-supplied legal market, and absolutely no way that they can monopolize it, assuming a civilization not in total anarchy.
Sure, assuming an instant legalization, criminal enterprises and gangs will be left suddenly scrambling to find some other way of surviving outside the law, and they will try a number of models. But with the money spigot turned off, the lure will be lost for new recruits, and any attempts they make to switch to victim-based crimes will be met with a newly united front of community and law enforcement that will be formidable.
Normal, Illinois
Drug WarRant @ April 26, 2008 # No Comment Yet
Last night — just a typical Friday night college party in Normal, Illinois, with the police using knives to break into bedrooms without a warrant.
They conducted a 3-hour search, but no drugs were found.
I’m particularly fond of the officer’s gracious reply — “Shut up!” — after the student respectfully calls him “sir.”
The video is in one of the back bedrooms. The report I heard was that the entry into the main apartment was also forced despite denial of consent.
We want our ‘role models’ to lie
Drug WarRant @ April 26, 2008 # No Comment Yet
Link (Via Baylen)
The next big scandal in sports come from a statement made on radio by Dallas Mavericks forward Josh Howard. Howard explains:
“What I was stating was just [in response to] a random question he asked me about the marijuana use. I just let him know that most of the players in the league use marijuana and I have and do partake in smoking weed in the offseason sometimes and that’s my personal choice and my personal opinion. But I don’t think that’s stopping me from doing my job.”
He’s not using marijuana during the season, and he hasn’t flunked any drug tests.
So now the league and the press are scrambling to find how you punish someone for… um… telling the truth.
Mavericks owner Mark Cuban said before Friday’s game against the Hornets that any punishment from the club will be meted out “internally.”
“We won’t make it public,” Cuban said. “But we’ll deal with it.
“We’ll do what we need to do and deal with it internally and then that’s it.”
Did you get carried away and shoot 50 times at an unarmed man killing him? No problem.
Drug WarRant @ April 25, 2008 # No Comment Yet
The Sean Bell case ends up with acquittals on all charges. Apparently nobody did anything wrong.
Open Thread
Drug WarRant @ April 25, 2008 # No Comment Yet
Action Alert: Contact your representatives and have them support the federal marijuana decriminalization bill.
Dust-up, Day 5: Drug Policy from Scratch. Stimson reaches deep into his rectum and pulls out the Nixon/Linkletter argument.